Evidence-Based Practices for
Healthiest Wisconsin 2010
Select a Priority
| Research Methods
| Contributors
| Contacts
| Feedback
Health priority: Access to primary and preventive health services
Objective: By 2010, increase by 10 percent the proportion of each of the following populations who receive ongoing
preventive and restorative oral health care: Medicaid/BadgerCare,
uninsured, and underinsured populations.
Sufficient Evidence for Effectiveness was found for the following
interventions:
Insufficient Evidence to Determine Effectiveness was found for the
following interventions:
- Efforts to
encourage oral health screening by other health care providers
(PDF, 21 KB)
- Efforts to engage
Head Start personnel in promoting oral health care
(PDF, 29 KB)
- Increasing
Medicaid reimbursement rates for oral health care
(PDF, 24 KB)
- Partnerships to
improve state-based oral health services and strengthen the oral health safety
net (PDF, 26 KB)
- Policies
to broaden the scope of dental hygienists' practice
(PDF, 29 KB)
- Programs to
educate the public about oral health (PDF,
22 KB)
- Programs
to increase enrollment in insurance programs that provide access to dental care
(e.g., State Children's Health Insurance Program/BadgerCare)
(PDF, 25 KB)
- Strategies
to increase the availability of dentists, hygienists, and dental assistants in
underserved areas (PDF, 35 KB)
- Strategies to
increase the number of dentists, hygienists, and dental assistants
(PDF, 35 KB)
- Streamlining
Medicaid's administrative procedures for oral health care
(PDF, 33 KB)
- Training and
educational programs to increase cultural awareness and competency among oral
health providers
(PDF, 32 KB)
Mixed Evidence was found for the following interventions:
(none)
Sufficient Evidence for Ineffectiveness was found for the following
interventions:
(none)
Limitations/Comments:
There is a limited amount of literature that evaluates programs and
policies aimed at improving access to oral health care and reducing
disparities in this area. Moreover, existing research tends to focus on
narrow geographic areas or populations (e.g., children). Because there is
a limited amount of research examining current efforts to increase access
to ongoing and restorative care, most interventions outlined in this
section are categorized under "insufficient evidence to determine
effectiveness."
Additional Resources:
Albert DA, McManus JM, Mitchell DA. Models for Delivering School-Based
Dental Care. The Journal of School Health 2005 May;75(5):157.
American Dental Association. State Innovations to Improve Access to
Oral Health Care for Low-Income Children: A Compendium Update. 2005.
Available at: http://www.prnewswire.com/mnr/ada/20973/#. Accessed June 20,
2005.
American Dental Association. State and Community Models for Improving
Access to Dental Care for the Underserved - A White Paper. 2005. Available
at: http://www.ada.org/prof/resources/topics/topics_access_whitepaper.pdf.
Accessed June 20, 2005.
Formicola AJ, Ro M, Marshall S, Derksen D, et al. Strengthening the
Oral Health Safety Net: Delivery Models That Improve Access to Oral Health
Care for Uninsured and Underserved Populations. American Journal of Public
Health 2004 May; 94(5):702.
Report of the Governor's Task Force to Improve Access to Oral Health,
2005. Available at:
http://dhfs.wisconsin.gov/health/Oral_Health/taskforce/index.htm. Accessed
July 8, 2005.
Back to the Priority
page
Back to the Evidence-Based
Practices home page
PDF: The free Acrobat Reader® software is needed to
view and print portable document format (PDF) files.
Learn
more.
Last Revised: October 24, 2008
|